Home · 2025 Toyota Sienna · Complaints

What 258 owners told NHTSA about the 2025 Toyota Sienna

These are the actual owner complaints behind this car’s reliability verdict, filed with the federal government, unedited. They’re unverified reports, not confirmed defects: read them as leads for your pre-purchase inspection, not a diagnosis.

All (258)Crash / fire / injury (3)Seats (209)Visibility & wipers (17)Body & structure (15)Airbags (3)Backup camera & sensors (3)Seat belts (3)Brakes (2)Driver assistance (2)Latches & locks (2)Electrical system (1)

15 of 258 complaints match · Body & structure · clear filters

Jun 15, 2026Body & structure

My rear lift gate was misaligned and gets stuck. The dealer just fixed and wouldn't honor the warranty, but I believe this shoddy build quality could impact the safety of my family in an accident as it didn't appear the hatch was properly secured

NHTSA ODI 11744317

Apr 17, 2026Body & structure

I am filing a complaint regarding an unresolved safety recall for my 2025 Toyota Sienna involving the second-row seat welds. VIN: [XXX] NHTSA Recall ID: 25V668 Recall Date: October 7, 2025 Manufacturer/Dealer Recall Reference: 25TB12 This recall involves the structural integrity of the second-row seat welds. A failure of these welds could increase the risk of injury to occupants in the event of a crash or sudden stop. As of today, more than six months after the recall was issued, no remedy has been made available. I have not been provided with a repair, a timeline for when a fix will be available, or an adequate interim solution. On February 25, 2026, I brought my vehicle to the dealership, and it was placed out of service due to this recall. I was provided with a smaller loaner vehicle, which is not comparable to my Toyota Sienna and does not meet my transportation needs. This situation has left me without use of my vehicle for an extended period of time while also dealing with a known safety defect. I request that NHTSA review whether the delay in providing a remedy is reasonable and compliant with federal safety requirements, and whether additional action is necessary to protect vehicle occupants. All relevant vehicle details are included in this complaint. INFORMATION REDACTED PURSUANT TO THE FREEDOM OF INFORMATION ACT (FOIA), 5 U.S.C. 552(B)(6)

NHTSA ODI 11731882

Mar 16, 2026Body & structure

The passenger door has now twice started to close on its own without a button being pushed and when I've been standing there buckling a kid in. It does not stop when it encounters an object (me, a human) and kept trying to get me stuck into the door. I tried pushing back but it kept moving and eventually I had to back out of the way. If this had been a child, they would have had a broken limb or worse.

NHTSA ODI 11724614

Mar 7, 2026Body & structureSeats

My 2025 Toyota Sienna XLE (VIN: [XXX]) is subject to Safety Recall 25V668 related to defective second-row seat rail welds. The recall states that the seat structure may fail during certain high-speed collisions, increasing the risk of injury to passengers. As a result of this safety recall, my vehicle was suspended from passenger rental service on October 6, 2025 and has remained unusable for its intended purpose since that date. Toyota has confirmed that the recall status is “Remedy Not Available,” meaning no repair solution currently exists for this safety defect. The vehicle therefore cannot be safely used for passenger transport and continues to cause significant financial loss while loan payments remain due. I am filing this complaint because the vehicle has been unusable for an extended period of time due to a safety defect with no available remedy. INFORMATION REDACTED PURSUANT TO THE FREEDOM OF INFORMATION ACT (FOIA), 5 U.S.C. 552(B)(6)

NHTSA ODI 11722743

Feb 23, 2026Body & structure

vehicle has had an active recall since october of 2025. I was told by the dealership the recall made it unsafe to have people occupy the passenger seat as was confirmed by Toyota. I then asked to get a loaner car until the recall was remedied. That was denied. I am now asking for the lease to be terminated early due to me making payments on a vehicle that doesnt allow my children to be safe.

NHTSA ODI 11719901

Feb 20, 2026Body & structureSeats

We purchased a 2025 Toyota Sienna Woodland Edition in July 2025. On October 7, 2025 we were notified that vehicle is subject to a safety recall [NHSTA Recall No. 25V-668, Toyota Recall No. 25TA12 (Interim Notice 25TB12)] due to improperly welded seat rails. The recall states: "The subject vehicles contain second-row seats that are mounted on seat rails that may have been improperly welded. If these seats are occupied during certain high-speed collisions, the seat may lose structural integrity, increasing the risk of injury. All known owners of the subject vehicles will be notified to return their vehicles to a Toyota dealer. For all involved vehicles, the dealer will replace the second-row seat rails with rails that have proper welding, free of charge. For all involved vehicles, Toyota will notify customers by early December 2025." Following the recall notice, we returned our Toyota Sienna to the dealer due to the safety risk of putting our children (or any passenger) in the second row seats and we are currently driving a rental car. Toyota has not yet indicated a solution for this recall and has not provided a remedy as originally stated by December 2026. Given that it is now February 20, 2026 and our vehicle has been out of service for it's intended purpose for over 120 days without a remedy, we would like to officially log a complaint with the NHSTA.

NHTSA ODI 11719349

Feb 16, 2026Body & structureSeats

Toyota issued a recall due to suspected second row seat welds failing in a crash in October 7, 2025 and has not offered a remedy. The suggestion of not having anyone sit in the second row for over four months now is absurd and warrants investigation. The customers who purchase vans do so due to needing the space to occupy 5+ passengers and are not able to have all passengers sit in the third row putting passengers at risk daily without a solution. This is complete negligence by the company.

NHTSA ODI 11718192

Feb 5, 2026Body & structure

Over time, the trunk became increasingly difficult to open, progressing from what appeared to be a hands-free sensor issue to requiring a little manual force to open. It can be inspected upon request. The vehicle is not even one year since purchase and has around 8000 miles driven. The dealership has reproduced the issues and states it is an alignment issue between the trunk and the car's body but is unwilling to provide any remedy. They state that there appears to be improper latching of the trunk. There is concern that the trunk could open if the latch continues to wear down to the point of failure from misalignment. There has been no preceding accident or damage that would explain the misalignment.

NHTSA ODI 11716048

Jan 23, 2026Body & structureSeats

Open recall with no anticipated date of being fixed. The second row seats are unsafe for passengers which makes the vehicle unusable for a family.

NHTSA ODI 11713002

Jan 7, 2026Body & structure

The contact owns a 2025 Toyota Sienna. The contact stated that the rear liftgate was not properly aligned with the rear door frame. The contact stated that there was a gap of approximately ¼-inch between the top of the liftgate on the passenger side and the door frame when the tailgate was closed. The gap on the driver's side of the liftgate was not as pronounced as the gap on the passenger’s side. The contact stated that the liftgate appeared unbalanced. The contact stated that the liftgate was making abnormal creaking sounds while being raised or lowered. The contact stated that the latch where the liftgate locked to secure the liftgate showed scratches. The contact had taken the vehicle to a local dealer, where some minor adjustments were performed on the latch. The contact stated that the liftgate failure was not addressed. The vehicle was not repaired. The manufacturer was not informed of the failure. The failure mileage was approximately 11,000.

NHTSA ODI 11709417

Dec 29, 2025Body & structure

The second-row seat rails on my 2025 Toyota Sienna were manufactured with improper welds that can fail in a high-speed collision, potentially causing the seats to lose structural integrity and increasing the risk of severe injury. Safety Risk and Hardship: Due to this defect, Toyota has recommended that no passengers sit in the second row and no child restraints be used in these seats until a remedy is performed. I have been awaiting a remedy for over 70 days, during which time the vehicle's primary utility as a high-capacity family transport has been compromised. This creates a severe accessibility and safety hardship, as I am unable to safely transport my family or use child safety seats in the designated locations. Forcing passengers into the third row, which does not accommodate three carseats side-by-side, is not a safe long-term alternative for our family, especially as at [XXX] pregnant, and soon to be postpartum with a XXX and two XXX in carseats. Reproducibility and Inspection: The safety defect was confirmed by the manufacturer (Recall numbers 25TB12 and 25TA12) and by my local authorized dealer upon notification. While the vehicle is available for inspection, the manufacturer has acknowledged the defect is due to incorrect weld machine settings at the factory. Symptoms and Warnings: There were no warning lamps or messages prior to the recall notification. The issue was discovered by the manufacturer during internal testing between July and August 2024 and publicly announced in October 2025. INFORMATION REDACTED PURSUANT TO THE FREEDOM OF INFORMATION ACT (FOIA), 5 U.S.C. 552(B)(6)

NHTSA ODI 11707591

Dec 14, 2025Body & structureSeats

See recall above. We just spent $55,000 on this vehicle in order to safely transport and travel with our two year old and newborn. The fact that Toyota does not have a remedy available for this major issue is completely unacceptable. The recall notice states that our only current "remedy" is to not use the second row seats, which is not feasible since child safety seats only safely install in the second row. This so called "remedy" is absolutely unreasonable, illogical and irrational. It essentially renders our $55,000 vehicle unusable, which constitutes a significant financial loss for my family. I am making a loss of use claim - Toyota's response that it does not have a remedy available now for such a significant safety problem is outrageous.

NHTSA ODI 11704924

Dec 14, 2025Body & structureSeats

UNKNOWN Dear Toyota Motor Sales, U.S.A., Inc. Consumer Affairs Department: I am writing to formally demand a full buyback and refund for the above-referenced 2025 Toyota Sienna (the "Vehicle") under the Arkansas New Motor Vehicle Quality Assurance Act (the "Arkansas Lemon Law"), Ark. Code Ann. §§ 4-90-401 et seq. The Vehicle is subject to a critical safety recall (25TA12, with interim notice 25TB12) involving improperly welded second-row seat rails, which poses a substantial risk to the safety of myself, my passengers, and others on the road. As of the date of this letter, Toyota has issued no remedy for this defect and provided no estimated timeframe for when a repair will become available. This renders the Vehicle unusable for its intended business purpose and out of service indefinitely, in violation of the implied warranties of merchantability and fitness for a particular purpose, as well as the express warranties provided with the Vehicle. Background and Defect: I purchased the vehicle on [XXX], new from Landers Toyota NWA, Rogers AR for $49,058. The Vehicle has been registered and primarily used in Arkansas since acquisition. On or about October 7, 2025, Toyota issued Recall 25TA12, notifying owners that the second-row seats in certain 2025 Sienna models, including my VIN , are mounted on seat rails that may have been improperly welded. This defect could cause the seats to detach during a crash, increasing the risk of injury or death. An interim notice (25TB12) followed, confirming the issue but explicitly stating that no repair remedy is currently available and no loaner vehicles or temporary fixes are being provided. Since receiving notice of the recall, the Vehicle has been effectively out of service for safe operation. I cannot, in good conscience, use this vehicle with a known safety defect that compromises occupant protection in the event of an accident. Toyota has failed to provide any repair, temporary solution, or estimated completion date, leaving me without a functional vehicle for commercial purposes. As of today, the Vehicle has been out of service for approximately 21 days due to this unresolved nonconformity, and with no remedy in sight, it will soon exceed the 30-day threshold under Arkansas law. Violation of Arkansas Lemon Law: Under the Arkansas Lemon Law, a "nonconformity" includes any defect that substantially impairs the use, value, or safety of the Vehicle (Ark. Code Ann. § 4-90-403(6)). The seat rail defect clearly meets this definition, as it directly endangers passenger safety and renders the Vehicle unfit for ordinary use. Ark. Code Ann. § 4-90-410(a) establishes a rebuttable presumption that Toyota has had a reasonable number of attempts to repair the nonconformity—and thus must provide a refund or replacement—under the following conditions, among others: (2) The vehicle is out of service by reason of repair, or attempt to repair, any nonconformity for a cumulative total of thirty (30) calendar days. In this case, no repair is possible because Toyota has not developed or authorized a remedy. However, the Vehicle is undeniably "out of service" due to the inability to address this safety-critical defect, and the indefinite delay ensures it will remain so well beyond 30 calendar days. Courts interpreting similar lemon laws have held that irremediable safety recalls qualify vehicles as "out of service" from the date the owner is notified, as the owner reasonably withholds use until the hazard is resolved (see, e.g., analogous interpretations under federal Magnuson-Moss Warranty Act, 15 U.S.C. § 2301 et seq., which supplements state lemon laws). Toyota's failure to provide a repair within a reasonable time triggers the presumption of a "lemon" under § 4-90-410(a)(2), entitling me to the remedies outlined in Ark. Code Ann. § 4-90-412. Additionally, pursuant to Ark. Code Ann. § 4-90-405, INFORMATION REDACTED PURSUANT TO THE FREEDOM OF INFORMATION ACT (FOIA), 5 U.S.C. 552(B)(6)

NHTSA ODI 11704956

Dec 11, 2025Body & structureSeats

We were notified by Toyota that the second row seat rails had incomplete welds. Toyota recommended no one ride in the second row, and no child car seats should be installed in the second row. This greatly impacts the use and safety of the vehicle for our family of five. Additionally, the value of the vehicle has been impacted. Dealerships are not willing to give fair value for a trade-in because they know the vehicle will sit on their lot for an unknown amount of time before the repair is available. At this time (now 60+ days since the recall was announced), Toyota has not released the remedy and there is no timeline for the completion of these repairs.

NHTSA ODI 11704484

Sep 23, 2025Body & structure

The contact owns a 2025 Toyota Sienna Hybrid. The contact stated that the rear liftgate appeared to show a design flaw, and the left and right sides of the liftgate appeared to be misaligned. The contact stated that the liftgate door was difficult to open manually or electronically. Several dealers were made aware of the failure on several occasions, but were not offered any assistance. The vehicle was taken to an independent mechanic who acknowledged the failure. The independent mechanic stated that the entire back panel was warped and that the door hinges were misaligned. The manufacturer was notified of the failure on three separate occasions but offered no assistance. The vehicle was not repaired. The failure mileage was approximately 10,000. The VIN was not available.

NHTSA ODI 11689178

Working with the data? Download all 258 complaints as CSV · fetched from NHTSA July 19, 2026

How to use these: a complaint is one owner’s report, filed voluntarily and published unverified. Patterns matter more than any single story. If several owners describe the same failure at similar mileage, put that system at the top of your pre-purchase inspection list. Back to the full 2025 Toyota Sienna verdict →