Home · 2016 Mercedes-benz Gl-class · Complaints

What 20 owners told NHTSA about the 2016 Mercedes-benz Gl-class

These are the actual owner complaints behind this car’s reliability verdict, filed with the federal government, unedited. They’re unverified reports, not confirmed defects: read them as leads for your pre-purchase inspection, not a diagnosis.

All (20)Crash / fire / injury (2)Seats (3)Electrical system (2)Engine (2)Steering (2)Visibility & wipers (2)Body & structure (1)Brakes (1)Latches & locks (1)Lights (1)Seat belts (1)

3 of 20 complaints match · Seats · clear filters

Jun 19, 2017Seats

2ND ROW HEAD REST UNSAFE AND UNUSEABLE - THE HEADREST IS TOO LOW AND TOO HIGH FOR A CHILD OR SMALL PERSON TO USE. WHEN IN DOWN POSITION, SEAT PUSHES HEAD FORWARD; WHEN IT IS UP, IT'S TOO TALL FOR THE HEAD. ALSO HEADREST IS VERY DIFFICULT TO PULL UP. BASICALLY, THIS PART IS NOT USEABLE BY ANYONE EXCEPT A VERY TALL PERSON. SHOULD BE REPLACED BY MERCEDES. INJURIES CAN OCCUR DUE TO THIS DESIGN. NO INCIDENT HAS OCCURRED; ONLY COMPLAINTS ABOUT USING THE HEAD REST.

NHTSA ODI 11000079

Jan 5, 2016Seats

THE SECOND ROW SEAT HEADREST IS UNUSABLE FOR MY CHILDREN. IT HITS THEM IN THE HEAD AND THEY ARE TOTALLY UNCOMFORTABLE. I SEE NOW THAT THIS IS A MAJOR SOURCE OF PROBLEMS FOR THIS VEHICLE. MANY PARENTS ARE COMPLAINING. MERCEDES HAS NO CURE FOR IT. NOT OK.

NHTSA ODI 10818230

Sep 15, 2015Seats

MY FATHER AND MOTHER IN-LAW RECENTLY PURCHASED A 2016 MERCEDES BENZ GL450 AS OUR FAMILY CAR. THE HEADRESTS FOR THE 2ND ROW SEATS WITH THE "EASY ENTRY" OPTION APPEAR TO POSE A COMFORT AND SAFETY ISSUE FOR BOTH CAR SEATS AND "SHORTER" PEOPLE... I WOULD SAY 5'-3" AND SHORTER. WITH THE "EASY ENTRY" OPTION THE 2ND ROW HEAD RESTS ARE ONLY 2 POSITION, FULLY LOWERED OR FULLY EXTENDED. FULLY ADJUSTABLE HEIGHTS ARE NOT POSSIBLE. BOTH POSITIONS POSE A COMFORT AND SAFETY ISSUE. AT THE FULLY LOWERED POSITION, A CHILD'S CAR SEAT WOULD NOT BE FLUSH WITH THE SEAT AS THE HEAD REST FORCES THE CAR SEAT TO LEAN FORWARD IN AN UNSTABLE CONDITION. ALSO FOR "SHORTER" PEOPLE, THE HEAD REST AT THE FULLY LOWERED POSITION FORCES A PERSON'S HEAD TO LEAN FORWARD IN A VERY UNCOMFORTABLE AND UN-NATURAL POSITION. WITH THE HEADRESTS AT THE FULLY EXTENDED POSITION, THE CAR SEAT BACK DOESN'T QUITE REST ON THE THE SEAT AS THE HEAD REST STILL PROTRUDES FROM THE VERTICAL PLANE OF THE SEAT. THEREFORE THE CAR SEAT IS ONCE AGAIN IN AN UNSTABLE CONDITION EVEN THOUGH SECURED BY THE SEAT BELT RESTRAINT SYSTEM. FOR THE "SHORTER" PEOPLE, THE HEADREST AT THE FULLY EXTENDED POSITION IS EXTREMELY UNCOMFORTABLE AS THE HEADREST PROTRUDES, AS INDICATED ABOVE, AND SO THE PERSON'S HEAD IS RESTING ON AN EDGE OF THE HEADREST, IN A LEANED FORWARD POSITION. PLEASE REVIEW THIS ISSUE FURTHER AS I'M SURE THERE HAVE BEEN OTHER COMPLAINTS ON WHAT IS PERCEIVED TO BE A MANUFACTURER'S DESIGN ISSUE.

NHTSA ODI 10763773

Working with the data? Download all 20 complaints as CSV · fetched from NHTSA July 26, 2026

How to use these: a complaint is one owner’s report, filed voluntarily and published unverified. Patterns matter more than any single story. If several owners describe the same failure at similar mileage, put that system at the top of your pre-purchase inspection list. Back to the full 2016 Mercedes-benz Gl-class verdict →