Home · 2013 Nissan Juke · Complaints

What 102 owners told NHTSA about the 2013 Nissan Juke

These are the actual owner complaints behind this car’s reliability verdict, filed with the federal government, unedited. They’re unverified reports, not confirmed defects: read them as leads for your pre-purchase inspection, not a diagnosis.

All (102)Crash / fire / injury (9)Engine (40)Fuel system (18)Transmission & drivetrain (16)Electrical system (14)Speed control (8)Suspension (5)Visibility & wipers (5)Body & structure (4)Steering (4)Wheels (3)

14 of 102 complaints match · Electrical system · clear filters

May 27, 2026Electrical system

Odometer Fraud. The contact purchased a 2013 Nissan Juke. The contact discovered that there was a mileage discrepancy after purchasing the vehicle. The vehicle was a mechanic sale. At the time of purchase, the vehicle mileage was 71,000 and at the time of registration, but it was discovered that the mileage on the Title was 69,018.

NHTSA ODI 11740433

Dec 5, 2025Electrical system

Odometer Fraud. The contact purchased a 2013 Nissan Juke. The vehicle was a local dealer sale. Upon delivery of the vehicle, the odometer reading was not displayed on the instrument panel due to a faulty Tire Pressure Monitoring System; however, the Title indicated that the mileage was 83,950. After repairing the Tire Pressure Monitoring System, the odometer displayed 127,000 miles. The local dealer was contacted regarding the mileage discrepancy, but no assistance was offered.

NHTSA ODI 11703284

Nov 17, 2025Electrical system

Odometer Fraud. The contact won an auction for the 2013 Nissan Juke on November 15th, 2025. It was discovered that there was a mileage discrepancy. The contact had only placed a holding fee for the vehicle due to the mileage on the auction paperwork being different from other mileage reports for the VIN. At the time of purchase, the vehicle mileage was 115,087. The contact found on the Florida Highway Safety Motor Vehicles website, the title found that the mileage was reported as 140,000 on September 14th, 2024. The contact had not reported the odometer fraud to other agencies.

NHTSA ODI 11699834

Sep 28, 2022Electrical system

The contact owns a 2013 Nissan Juke. The contact stated that the dealer had previously replaced the coolant system, fuel pump, and fuel injection high-pressure pump; however, the failure recurred while driving at 55 MPH with a fuel odor coming from the air vents while the A/C was activated. The vehicle was shaking and then inadvertently decelerated and lost motive power. The vehicle was towed to the dealer where it was diagnosed that the thermostat needed to be replaced. The vehicle was not repaired. The manufacturer was not made aware of the failure. The failure mileage was approximately 56,000.

NHTSA ODI 11486906

Jan 13, 2022Electrical system

Car was running, no prior issues. Shut off car, returned a few hours later and it would not start. Everything else worked, but wouldn't attempt to turn over. Was -18 at night with my young kids in rural nowhere. Came back next day with tow, and it started. Replaced cruise and brake module per suggestions. Ran fine for another few weeks, then repeated the issue. Replaced battery with AGM battery. Started. Next day it happened again, once I got to work. Towed it home. Reprogramed keys. Nothing. Replaced starter. A few days later it started. After a month, it sputtered out after starting, then would not start (inside garage). Later that day, it started. Inspected by Nissan and various mechanics. No warning lights. Ran diagnostics and nothing. I absolutely hate the unpredictability but like my vehicle, but not enough to leave my kids and I stranded; especially in the cold winter.

NHTSA ODI 11447383

Nov 20, 2020Electrical system

CAR WOULD AT TIMES NOT START UP AGAIN AFTER RUNNING AN ERRAND OR TRIP, AT FIRST WE COULD JUMP START THE VEHICLE BUT LATER IT WOULDN'T WORK THAT WAY, NEW BATTERY NEW STARTER, ALTERNATOR REPLACED NOTHING WORKED FINALLY WOULDN'T START AT ALL MACHANIC FOUND A SHORT IN THE FUSE BOX HE COULDN'T REPLACE IT HAD TO BE DONE AT A DEALERSHIP GARAGE 1200 DOLLARS LATER EVERYTHING SEEMS TO BE WORKING RIGHT

NHTSA ODI 11375658

Sep 20, 2019Electrical system

TL* THE CONTACT OWNS A 2013 NISSAN JUKE. THE CONTACT STATED THAT AFTER DEPRESSING THE BRAKE PEDAL AND THE ENGINE START BUTTON, THE VEHICLE WOULD NOT IMMEDIATELY START. THE CAUSE OF THE FAILURE WAS NOT DETERMINED. BILL SEIDLE'S NISSAN (10500 NW 12TH ST, MIAMI, FL) AND THE MANUFACTURER WERE NOTIFIED OF THE FAILURE. THE CONTACT WAS INFORMED THAT THE VIN WAS NOT INCLUDED IN NHTSA CAMPAIGN NUMBER: 15V418000 (ELECTRICAL SYSTEM). THE CONTACT STATED THAT THE VEHICLE EXPERIENCED THE SAME FAILURE LISTED IN THE RECALL. THE FAILURE MILEAGE WAS 82,500.

NHTSA ODI 11256784

Jun 5, 2019Electrical systemElectronic Stability Control (esc)

MY NISSAN JUKE 2013 IS HAVING ELECTRICAL PROBLEMS. I BROUGHT IT TO GERALD NISSAN IN NAPERVILLE, IL AND THEY TOLD ME THE IPDM NEEDED TO BE REPLACED FOR $1,100.00 AND THEY STILL WEREN'T SURE IT WOULD FIX THE PROBLEM. THE VEHICLE WON'T START SOMETIMES, IT STAYS WHILE DRIVING (VERY SCARY). IT OVER HEATED ONCE BECAUSE A SIGNAL WASN'T SENT TO THE FAN. I'VE NOTICED THIS IS I BIG COMPLAINT ISSUE WITH NISSAN. IS THERE A RECALL ON SUCH A PROBLEM. I CAN'T EVEN DRIVE THE CAR THE WAY IT IS BECAUSE I NEVER KNOW WHAT'S​ GOING TO HAPPEN NEXT. JOE

NHTSA ODI 11218141

Mar 7, 2019Electrical systemEngine

MY CAR SHAKES A LOT AND WANT TO CONCOW OUT A LOT, AND I TOOK IT INTO A SHOP AND THEY SAID THAT HAVE SOME CODES ON THERE TOO NEED TO BE FIX

NHTSA ODI 11184856

Jun 9, 2017Electrical system

TL* THE CONTACT OWNS A 2013 NISSAN JUKE. WHILE DRIVING APPROXIMATELY 15 MPH, THE VEHICLE LOST POWER AND WAS ABLE TO RESTART AFTER ONE ATTEMPT. THE VEHICLE WAS TAKEN TO THE DEALER (KRAFT NISSAN 3277 MAHAN DR, TALLAHASSEE, FL 32308), BUT THE FAILURE COULD NOT BE DUPLICATED. THE MANUFACTURER WAS MADE AWARE OF THE FAILURE. THE VIN WAS NOT INCLUDED IN NHTSA CAMPAIGN NUMBER: 15V418000 (ELECTRICAL SYSTEM). THE FAILURE MILEAGE WAS UNKNOWN.

NHTSA ODI 10994189

May 15, 2017Electrical systemEngine

WE PURCHASED A BRAND NEW NISSAN JUKE 2013, INCLUDING A MAINTENANCE AND SERVICE CONTRACT. OVER THE PAST 3 YEARS THE NISSAN JUKE HAS REFUSED TO START DOZENS OF TIMES. WE ARE PETRIFIED THAT IT WILL STOP RUNNING WHILE WE DRIVE IT. OFTEN IT WILL NOT EVEN START WITH JUMPER CABLES. DESPITE HAVING THE JUKE IN AND OUT OF THE NISSAN DEALERSHIP SHOP OVER THE LAST THREE YEARS, NISSAN HAS BEEN COMPLETELY UNABLE TO DETERMINE AND FIX THE DEFECT. EACH TIME NISSAN SIMPLY CHARGES THE BATTERY, OR REPLACES IT. ON AT LEAST 8 SEPARATE OCCASIONS NISSAN HAS CLEARED THE JUKE AS OK TO DRIVE, ONLY TO HAVE IT FAIL TO START WITHIN SEVERAL MONTHS. WE HAVE BEEN STRANDED MANY TIMES, AND NOW CARRY JUMPER CABLES AND 2 HAND HELD POWER STARTERS, THOUGH THESE OFTEN FAIL TO START THE CAR. WE DO NOT WANT TO RESELL THIS VEHICLE ON THE USED MARKET TO UNSUSPECTING CONSUMERS SINCE THE JUKE IN ITS DEFECTIVE CONDITION IS CLEARLY A SERIOUS HAZARD TO USERS AND OTHERS ON THE ROAD. WE ASKED NISSAN ON APRIL 12, 2017 TO REPURCHASE THE VEHICLE, BUT THEY REFUSED BY LETTER DATED APRIL 21, 2017 SINCE OUR LEMON LAW ONLY PROTECTS BUYERS FOR 20 MONTHS FROM PURCHASE. WE HAVE A COMPLETE SPREADSHEET WITH ATTACHED INVOICES WITH COMPLETE DETAILS OF ALL NISSAN'S ATTEMPTS TO FIX THE JUKE AND THEIR EXCUSES. THIS NISSAN JUKE HAS BEEN THE MOST UNRELIABLE AND DANGEROUS CAR WE HAVE EVER OWNED, AND NISSAN'S FAILURE TO ADEQUATELY FIX THIS DEFECTIVE CAR OVER THE PAST 3 YEARS HAS BEEN SHAMEFUL. THIS VEHICLE SHOULD BE TAKEN OFF THE ROAD BEFORE SOMEONE GETS KILLED. WHILE WE WERE ABLE TO UPLOAD THE SPREADSHEET, THE EXHIBITS WERE TOO LARGE, AND CAN BE EMAILED ON REQUEST.

NHTSA ODI 10985857

Sep 14, 2015Electrical systemEngineFire

WHILE PARKED IN OUR DRIVEWAY FOR MORE THAN 30 HRS, MY 2013 JUKE BURST INTO FLAMES. THE FIRE DEPT DID NOT FIND ANY EVIDENCE OF ARSON OR TAMPERING AND THERE WAS NO WEATHER OCCURRENCE TO EXPLAIN WHY IT BECAME ENGULFED IN FLAMES. THE FIRE STARTED IN THE ENGINE COMPARTMENT AT 12:40AM. NISSAN HAS SAID THAT THEY EXAMINED THE CAR AND THEIR TECHNICAL SPECIALIST FOUND " NO EVIDENCE OF A PRODUCT PROBLEM, FAILURE, OR MALFUNCTION THAT MAY HAVE CAUSED OR CONTRIBUTED TO THIS INCIDENT". NISSAN WILL NOT TELL ME WHY THE CAR BURNED UP, JUST THEY'RE NOT RESPONSIBLE. WHY WOULD A LOW MILAGE, WELL MAINTAINED VEHICLE CATCH FIRE UNLESS THERE WAS SOME KIND OF PRODUCT FAILURE? I WAS LUCKY THAT ONLY PROPERTY WAS DAMAGED BUT I FEEL NISSAN USA IS NOT TAKING THE INCIDENT SERIOUSLY.

NHTSA ODI 10763505

Jan 20, 2015Electrical systemFire

TL* THE CONTACT OWNS A 2013 NISSAN JUKE. THE CONTACT STATED THAT WHILE THE VEHICLE WAS BEING SERVICED FOR A ROUTINE OIL CHANGE, THE TECHNICIAN NOTICED SMOKE COMING FROM THE DRIVER'S SIDE DASHBOARD. THE TECHNICIAN DISCOVERED THAT THE ELECTRONIC BODY CONTROL MODULE (ECM) NEEDED TO BE REPAIRED. THE VEHICLE WAS NOT REPAIRED. THE MANUFACTURER WAS NOT MADE AWARE OF THE FAILURE. THE APPROXIMATE FAILURE MILEAGE WAS 26,000.

NHTSA ODI 10676587

Jan 12, 2015Electrical system

1ST INCIDENT, I WAS DRIVING ON A CITY STREET AT APPROX 30 MPH, WHEN I LOOKED AT THE SPEEDOMETER IT REGISTERED 75 MPH. I SLOWED TO A STOP AND THE SPEEDOMETER WAS AT 40 MPH WITH THE CAR STOPPED. I CONTINUED TO MY DESTINATION AND THE SPEED WAS SHOWING MY SPEED PLUS 40. I THEN SHUT THE CAR OFF FOR APPROX. 10 MINUTES AND THE SPEEDOMETER RESET TO 0. 2ND AND 3RD INCIDENT, DECEMBER 18, AND 27 2015, I WAS ON THE HIGHWAY TRAVELING AT APPROX. 70 MPH, I LOOKED AT THE SPEEDOMETER AND IT WAS AT 120+ MPH, MY INITIAL REACTION WAS TO SLOW DOWN CAUSING THE TRAFFIC BEHIND ME TO SLOW DOWN AND SWERVE AROUND ME. THE 3 INCIDENTS WERE REPORTED TO THE NISSAN DEALER, I WAS TOLD THAT NOTHING COULD BE DONE UNTIL THEY COULD SEE THE PROBLEM AND GET A CODE. I FEEL THAT THIS IS A MAJOR SAFETY ISSUE FOR NOT ONLY MYSELF AND MY FAMILY , BUT ALSO FOR THE OTHER PEOPLE THAT ARE ON THE ROAD WITH ME. *TR

NHTSA ODI 10671787

Working with the data? Download all 102 complaints as CSV · fetched from NHTSA July 25, 2026

How to use these: a complaint is one owner’s report, filed voluntarily and published unverified. Patterns matter more than any single story. If several owners describe the same failure at similar mileage, put that system at the top of your pre-purchase inspection list. Back to the full 2013 Nissan Juke verdict →