Car unintentionally accelerated striking a garage door and parked car.
NHTSA ODI 11750014
Home · 2025 Lexus Rx350l · Complaints
These are the actual owner complaints behind this car’s reliability verdict, filed with the federal government, unedited. They’re unverified reports, not confirmed defects: read them as leads for your pre-purchase inspection, not a diagnosis.
5 of 18 complaints match · crash/fire/injury only · clear filters
Car unintentionally accelerated striking a garage door and parked car.
NHTSA ODI 11750014
Around 11 am on Sat., May 2, 2026, I was sitting in a very long line in Starbuck's drive thru when my 2025 Lexus RX hybrid suddenly and uncontrollably accelerated--like an uncontrollable bucking horse. Brakes didn't work. I couldn't stop my out of control car, and the multiple computer sensors also didn't stop the car. It was like the throttle was engaged because of a computer glitch. In an effort to avoid hitting the car in front of me, I immediately tried to swerve, but still hit the car, then jumped the exceptionally high curb and ended up in the grass below and almost into the busy road ahead of me. It was terrifying. The car in front of me hit the car in front of her. The exact same issue happened to me on June 18, 2025 when my car unintentionally accelerated--also in a very tight space and going at 2 mph. There was no accident at this time because my car's computer stopped me from plowing into the building immediately in front of me after unintentionally accelerating. The next day at the recommendation of the person who sold me the car, I took my new Lexus to the service department. They gave me a loaner and told me to contact Toyota's/Lexus' Brand Engagement department in order to start the review, which I did. The review was conducted and ended around July 9, 2025 . On Mon., May 4, 2026 I took my car back to the Lexus dealer where I purchased, but was not given a loaner, which I requested, and was told I would need to wait several hours to have this inspected. I then took my car to Boyce Body Werks. A State Farm agent examined my car and initially approved almost $24K worth of damages. Boyce Body Werks is saying when they disassembled my car that there was more damage underneath my car. I also notified Toyota/Lexus about the same issue that happened one year prior. They also refused to give me a loaner, and I am now forced to pay my rental fees. Boyce Body Werks--a Lexus certified dealer has multiple pictures of the damage. My car is still under warranty.
NHTSA ODI 11738344
On April 1, 2026, while pulling into a parking space at our church, I was applying the brake when the vehicle suddenly and forcefully surged forward without warning. The unintended acceleration was intense and unexpected, occurring despite continuous braking input. This resulted in the vehicle striking the building and causing significant damage to both the vehicle and the structure. This incident has occurred twice within a 10 day period, both times during low-speed parking/stopping maneuvers. There were no warning lights, alerts, no automatic emergency braking engagement, no air bag deployment, or prior indications of malfunction. I did report this to the police and they filed an Incident Report. Lexus was notified and an independent analysis engineer examined the data from the vehicle's CDR System. This report was sent to me and to Lexus.
NHTSA ODI 11731649
On November 11, 2025, while reversing inside a garage, the rearview camera image— which had initially displayed correctly on the vehicle’s screen—suddenly froze while the vehicle remained in reverse mode. At the same time, the Pre-Collision System (PCS) failed to engage the brakes while the vehicle was traveling at approximately 2–3 miles per hour. As a result, the vehicle struck the garage structure and sustained damage. Toyota investigated this incident (Case #XXX) but based its conclusion on the incorrect assumption that I had reported either a brake system malfunction or a complete absence of an image on the display (a dark or blank screen). Because of this, Toyota determined that it could not provide assistance regarding the resulting vehicle damage. This characterization is inaccurate. The issue was not a blank screen. The rearview camera image appeared normally and then froze while the vehicle was still in reverse. My vehicle is currently subject to Recall Campaign No. 25LA06, which addresses reliability issues involving critical safety-related electronic systems. The rear visibility system is a federally mandated safety feature under 49 CFR §571.111 (Rear Visibility Requirements). When the image freezes during active vehicle operation, the system no longer provides the required real-time visibility necessary for safe reversing. Given the existence of an active recall campaign aimed at addressing reliability issues within the vehicle's electronic safety systems, this malfunction should be considered potentially linked to a defect covered by Recall Campaign No. 25LA06. The failure of the rear-view system during vehicle operation directly contributed to the occurrence of the collision.
NHTSA ODI 11724502
The contact owns a 2025 Lexus RX 350. The contact stated that while driving into a parking space, the vehicle suddenly experienced unintended acceleration and drove forward at a high rate of speed before crashing into the brick wall of an office building. During the crash, no air bags deployed, and the brake pedal was hard when pressed and did not stop the vehicle. Also, the manufacturer's APP indicated a malfunction in the engine and engine throttle during the incident. The driver sustained injuries to the knees, arms, and hips, which required medical treatment. An incident report was filed by the facility Patrol Officer, and the vehicle was towed to the collision center. The cause of the failures was not determined. The manufacturer and local dealer were notified of the incident. An engineer from the manufacturer was sent to examine the vehicle and reported no trouble found. The contact indicated that upon delivery of the vehicle, several electronic features did not function properly, including the display and navigation screen. The manufacturer and local dealer were notified of the failure. The failure mileage was 106.
NHTSA ODI 11690554
Working with the data? Download all 18 complaints as CSV · fetched from NHTSA July 21, 2026