What 126 owners told NHTSA about the 2022 Ford Mustang Mach-e

Car went into deep sleep mode after 12 volt battery malfunctioned. Car was completely disabled although it was fully charged. Ford dealership I took to had no knowledge of this ever happening, had no knowledge of vehicle having a 12 v battery, and claimed to of baver heard of any vehicle going into deep sleep mode.

NHTSA ODI 11521870

The cruise control is activated by the slightest touch of the button. Running the heel of your hand over the button will activate it. The button acts like a screen touch rather than a button.

NHTSA ODI 11518037

As I was driving to merge onto the freeway my screen panel said “safely stop now”, with a turtle logo and battery icon coming on. my car then came to a complete stop within a few seconds in the middle of the on-ramp leaving me stranded. I repeatedly tried to turn the car on and off to see if i could get it to accelerate again but to no avail. I had no time to pull my car over since it died immediately. I had enough charge on my battery and am not sure what could have caused this. I’ve seen that mustang Mach e’s have had previous recalls with a component overheating and am not sure if this may be the reason. After about 15 minutes I attempted to turn my car on again and it started with none of the same messages appearing. This is very unsettling as this could have led to a serious incident if I were on the freeway going at full speed with a sudden car stop.

NHTSA ODI 11517977

Nothing has failed, but I've determined the Suspension in all Ford Mustang Mach-Es from 2021-2023, excluding the Mach-E GT Performance is flawed. At first I thought it was just unengineered and terrible, but i've come to the conclusion that it's possibly dangerous. Driving yesterday on a city street and the road had a slight transition from left to right and at that very place , the road also has a bit of a bump, i hit that during the slight transition to the right and the car bounced up and the rear end almost stepped out, putting the car sideways (It did not, but slightly faster or more of an angle change, it's very possible it would have). Again as I stated before, the suspension is underdamped for the weight of the vehicle and it's quite easy for it to get unsettled, heck even just coming out of a parking lot it can get unsettled. I'm afraid someone is going to find this out the hard way and someone is going to get hurt. I'd say this is akin to loading a 1/2 ton truck with 1 ton of cargo, it is illegal and really this suspension trying to handle the battery weight, plus the car and passengers, it's just not up to the task. As a Ford shareholder, it's not that I'd like to see Ford hurt. I'd like to see them fix this issue and actually engineer a safe suspension,a capable suspension for a vehicle that almost weighs 5K lbs.

NHTSA ODI 11517626

The HVBJB (high-voltage battery junction box) subassembly in ALL Ford Mach-e vehicles has known defects with insufficiently robust main contactors that are known to fail under normal charging and driving conditions as outlined in NHTSA Campaign Number 22V412000. Unfortunately, the internal damage to contactors is not visible externally, and warning notices on display only after damage has occurred, and can result in sudden loss of propulsion power at highway speed, loss of power steering, and power brakes, as well as failure of other 12V systems due to inability to charge the 12V battery properly after contactors are damaged. Less catastrophic results can include failure to start, which can strand drivers and passengers in remote areas, bad weather conditions, and also cause loss of use for weeks due to delays in replacement parts and local dealerships needing equipment and training to effect removal/replacement of faulty unit with a new, more robust HVBJB.​ ​ My complaint is that Ford's recall under campaign 22V412000 is a software-only attempt to prevent future damage, and does not require the part(s) which are KNOWN to fail to be replaced with the re-designed components which are available, and have been used to repair failures under warranty. I have no way of inspecting the original equipment to evaluate current condition; and failure can result in sudden and unexpected loss of power, steering, and braking as well as potentially stranding me in unsafe conditions unable to restart my vehicle.​ ​ I would like to see NHTSA strengthen the Ford recall to include both improved software AND removal/replacement of the HVBJB sub-assembly with the new, more robust parts without a known failure risk.​ Thank you very much for your time.

NHTSA ODI 11510276

Unknown: Continuous vehicle security system alarms that are going off day and night without any signs of intrusion. I have had the 2022 Ford Mach-E for over 4 weeks and the alarm goes off at least 2 times day and night.

NHTSA ODI 11505281

I am randomly receiving the errors: "Front Camera Fault" "Pre-Collision Assist Not Available" Also, my cruise control no longer works while this error is active. Error will clear itself after a few minutes, but will still pop up from time to time.

NHTSA ODI 11501612

The contact owns a 2022 Ford Mustang Mach-E. The contact stated that while driving 20 MPH with the one pedal feature activated, the "one pedal drive fault, press brake to reduce speed" warning message appeared on the instrument panel. The contact depressed the brake pedal and the brakes failed to operate as needed. The contact coasted the vehicle to a stop and restarted the vehicle. Upon restart of the vehicle, several warning lights appeared on the instrument panel. The contact restarted the vehicle again as both the brake and electrical failures persisted. Due to the failure, the contact called for a tow; however, while waiting for a tow truck, the contact managed to restart the vehicle again and the vehicle resumed normal operation. The contact drove the vehicle home and then had the vehicle towed to the dealer the next day. A diagnostic test was performed which showed that the charging module needed to be replaced. The manufacturer was notified of the failure. The vehicle was not repaired and remained in the possession of the dealer. The failure mileage was 6,168.

NHTSA ODI 11498008

The contact owns a 2022 Ford Mustang Mach E. The contact stated while driving approximately 65 MPH, the charging system warning light illuminated and informed the contact that the battery was not charging correctly. The contact drove back to her residence however, when she plugged the vehicle into the charging cable, she saw another warning light that stated that the battery was not charging to full capacity. The contact stated that she started to notice a drop in drivable range with the vehicle. The contact drove the vehicle to a dealer who diagnosed that the charging port had loosened wires that needed to be replaced. The contact was advised that the part for the repair was on a national back order. Additionally, the contact stated she was experiencing manufacturer installed GPS and mapping failures which led to several wrong locations being mapped. The vehicle had not been repaired. The manufacturer had been informed of the failure. The failure mileage was approximately 5,600.

NHTSA ODI 11498036

Power steering went out including 10+ error / fault codes displaying on the dash on the vehicle after planned having vehicle towed but was back to normal after a restart. Exiting the parking lot at a low speed power steering failed again resulting in a low speed crash. After having it towed to dealership they reviewed software on the vehicle seeing vehicle has has fault codes and module errors for 3+ months on their Ford telemetries cloud system showing module and system errors every other day. Dealership asked if I ever got notice via vehicle or app about these errors which I never received. Ford Legal was notified and said vehicle did have a possible Bluecruise recall and nothing wrong with vehicle without having a Ford Engineer viewing the vehicle. My dealership still said cloud system showed all these errors which didn't seem be an issue to ford. My insurance said they'd make repairs but if my dealership said vehicle isn't safe they recommenced fix what is needed which Ford said 0 issues.

NHTSA ODI 11489576

faulty high voltage battery junction box NHTSA Campaign Number: 22V412000

NHTSA ODI 11489060

The HVBJB subassembly in ALL Ford Mach-e vehicles has known defects with 'under-designed' main contactors that are known to fail under normal charging and driving conditions as outlined in current open Ford recall notice for my vehicle 22s41. Unfortunately, the internal damage to contactors is not visible externally, and warning notices on display only after damage has occurred, and can result in sudden loss of propulsion power at highway speed, loss of power steering, and power brakes... and failure of other 12v systems due to failure to charge the 12v battery properly after contactors are damaged. Less catastrophic results can include failure to start; which can 'strand' driver's and passengers in remote areas, bad weather conditions, as well as cause loss of use for weeks due to delays in replacement parts and local Dealerships needing equipment and training to effect removal/replacement of faulty unit with a new HVBJB having re-designed 'beefier' components.​ ​ My complaint is that Ford's recall notice 22s41 is a software-only attempt to prevent future damage, and does not require removal of the part(s) which are KNOWN TO FAIL to be replaced with the re-designed components which are available, and have been used to repair failures under warranty. I have no way of inspecting the original equipment to evaluate current condition; and failure can result in sudden and unexpected loss of power, steering, and braking as well as potentially 'stranding me' in unsafe conditions unable to re-start my vehicle.​ ​ I would like to see NHTSA strengthen the Ford recall to include both improved software AND removal/replacement of the HVBJB sub-assembly with the new 'beefier' parts.

NHTSA ODI 11488714

THE BATTERY ENERGY CONTROL MODULE RECALL SOFTWARE UPDATE WAS COMPLETED ON MY VEHICLE ON SEPTEMBER 22ND 2022 AT 1203 PM AT GOSCH FORD OF HEMET. UPON LEAVING AROUND A MILE DOWN THE ROAD I WAS DRIVING AROUND A CORNER. WHILE IN THIS CORNER MULTIPLE THINGS HAPPENED AT THE SAME EXACT MOMENT. MY TRACTION LIGHT MOMENTARILY FLASHED ALONG WITH A SERVICE WRENCH. VEHICLE SKID PARTIALLY OFF-ROAD INTO THE DITCH. I LOST CONTROL FOR A BREIF MOMENT BUT WAS ABLE TO GAIN CONTROL BEFORE CRASHING. MY SPEED WAS DRASTICALLY REDUCED TO ABOUT 1/3 OF ITS NORMAL POWER. THE VEHICLE WOULD STILL DRIVE JUST MUCH SLOWER. UPON THIS HAPPENING I IMMEDIATELY TOOK MY VEHICLE BACK TO THE DEALERSHIP. THIS RECALL WAS VERY VAGUE. WHEN I WAS AT THE DEALERSHIP I INITIALLY ASKED THE FORD SERVICE SALESMAN DANIEL VENTURA IF THIS SOFTWARE CHANGED ANY ASPECT OF MY VEHICLES PERFORMANCE. HE THEN READ THE RECALL LETTER AND SAID IF IT DID IT NORMALLY WOULD SAY IT EITHER IN THE RECALL ITSELF OR THE LETTER FORD SENDS YOU THEY WOULD NORMALLYSAY IT IN IT. IT DID NOT MENTION THAT WHILE DRIVING THRU A CORNER IF YOU LOOSE POWER IN THE CAR DUE TO A BATTERY CONTROL MODULE FAILURE THAT YOU MAY LOOSE TRACTION AND LOOSE CONTROL OF THE CAR MOMENTARILY. THIS IS A VERY UNSAFE DRIVING CONDITION. FURTHERMORE WHEN I LEFT THE DEALERSHIP THE CAR DROVE DIFFERENTLY. IT SEEMED LIKE THE HORSE POWER WAS ABOUT 5-10 HP LESS THEN WHEN PURCHASED. IT FELT A LITTLE WEIRD TO GET USED TO DRIVING DOWN THE ROAD SINCE IT HAD A LITTLE BIT MORE PUSH THEN BEFORE. I MENTION THIS BECAUSE I BELIEVE THAT AS A CONSUMER I HAVE A RIGHT TO KNOW THE SOFTWARE THAT IS GOING INTO MY CAR. IF ANY ADVERSE REACTION THAT MAY CAUSE ME A DIFFERENT DRIVING EXPERIENCE OR PUT MY LIFE AT RISK OF CRASHING SHOULD HAVE BEEN INCLUDED IN THE SAFETY RECALL OR THE LETTER FORD HAD SENT US IN THE RECALL. I AM A FIRM BELIEVER THEY DO NOT WANT TO TELL US THAT THIS VEHICLE IS STILL NOT SAFE TO DRIVE AS WHAT HAPPENED TO ME HAVING THE BATTERY CONTROL MODULE FAILURE DURING CORNERING.

NHTSA ODI 11485995

While driving a warning message in red was displayed on the driver display indicating that the frunk(front trunk) hood was open and that the emergency frunk release had been activated. I pulled over and stopped and got out and closed the frunk hood. I continued driving and upon braking, the messages appeared again. This time I opened the hood and discovered that a folded hard-sided bag that was in the frunk had slid up against the emergency release button with enough force to trigger the emergency release.

NHTSA ODI 11483441

To whom it may concern, Today I washed my car for the first time. My brand new Mach-E that I purchased 2 weeks ago. While going through the car wash the charging port opened up and got soaked with soap and water. This effects the vehicle charging capability and cause an electric issue to the car.

NHTSA ODI 11483399

The contact owns a 2022 Ford Mustang. The contact stated while pulling into a parking spot at approximately 2 MPH and had not yet placed the vehicle in park, the vehicle had an unintended acceleration. The contact stated no warning light was illuminated. The vehicle crashed into a light post, ran over the post, and crashed into a back of a building. The vehicle had damage to the hood, grill and bumper and also to the undercarriage. The contact said he had not suffered any injuries. The police were on the scene and filed a report. The contact had the vehicle towed to a collision repair shop. The vehicle had not been diagnosed by a dealer or independent mechanic. The vehicle had not been repaired. The contact researched online and related the failure to NHTSA Campaign Number: 22V333000 (Vehicle Speed Control, Power Train). The manufacturer had been informed of the failure. The failure mileage was approximately 7,500.

NHTSA ODI 11482450

Brought Mach-E into dealership on 8/31 for recall on battery. Recall is corrected via a software update the can had not applied on its own after the last month. Car was serviced in about 2 hours and returned along with paperwork stating the recall was applied. Upon entering the car a new warning light was illuminated showing the software update was not yet complete. I assumed this just needed some more time to finish so the vehicle was driven home. Once home I used the messages on the center display to apply the update now. After about 20 min the first failure indicated the update was not applied because prerequisites were not met. A second attempt to apply the update was made and failed again. The failure clearly states it was not applied and that the update was intended to fix the specified recall. The car was immediately returned to the dealership with the error light still on at which point the service manager starts saying he’s sure they applied it but maybe the car didn’t take it. After some review the dealership they say they think the error is a conflict between the dealerships update and the over the air update systems but they believe it was actually installed even though the car says it failed. Due to other problems I’ve had at this dealership and the conflict of information at hand I don’t really have any way of knowing if this was properly applied. The dealership has asked to wait and check on it later to see if the errors continue.

NHTSA ODI 11482219

Vehicle had an unintended acceleration resulting in crash in a parking lot.

NHTSA ODI 11479784

Adaptive cruise control fault, pre-commission sensors not working, anti-lock break fault, restraint fault, tire pressure fault, dash turns off while driving which makes unable to see speed driving.

NHTSA ODI 11477929

Recall for this Mustang MachE. Unable to update software. This is a safety item and the intended fix is implemented by the vehicle owner. Took vehicle today to the Lake Geneva Wisconsin Ford dealership on 08.03.2022. Appointment made in advance. Ford service representative stated that it would take at least a half day. Appears no one has been trained on implementation on corrective actions. Other issue with navigation.

NHTSA ODI 11477298

I was pulling into my garage, steering with my left hand, making a slow, tight left turn from the drive way into the perpendicular garage. As the steering wheel turned, I believe my left palm hit the cruise control button and activated the adaptive cruise control. The vehicle suddenly accelerated toward the house without warning. I slammed on the brakes in response, tossing my wife forward and then back into her seat. When I looked at the dash immediately following the stop, the cruise control image was displayed showing the range keeping bars. There were two conditions present that should have prevented the cruise control from accelerating. First, the tight turn of the wheels to the left should have prevented acceleration and two, the house directly in front of the adaptive sensors should have said "HEY! There's a big object right in front of me, we should probably stop, not speed up!" A GIF video from my surveillance camera is attached to this report showing the incident.

NHTSA ODI 11477086

This incident occurred on July 15th 2022. The dealership, Koons Falls Church Ford, located in Falls Church VA, sold us a car with an active recall on it. About 3 days after the car leaving the lot, the service department contacted us about a recall notice that needed to be resolve via software update. This issue could lead to the entire car losing power while in motion, recall number 22V412000. This information WAS NOT disclosed to us at any time during the sales process, and we did not find out until later that evening when looking for accessories online. VIN: [XXX] INFORMATION Redacted PURSUANT TO THE FREEDOM OF INFORMATION ACT (FOIA), 5 U.S.C. 552(B)(6).

NHTSA ODI 11476223

The High Voltage Battery Junction Box (HVBJB) in ALL Ford Mustang Mach-E vehicles has known defects with faulty main contactors that are known to fail under normal charging and driving conditions as outlined in current open Ford recall notice for my vehicle 22S41. Unfortunately, the internal damage to contactors is not visible externally, and warning notices on display only after damage has occurred, and can result in sudden loss of propulsion power at highway speed, loss of power steering, and power brakes...and failure of other 12v systems due to failure to charge the 12v battery properly after contactors are damaged. Less catastrophic results can include failure to start; which can strand driver's and passengers in remote areas, bad weather conditions, as well as cause loss of use for weeks due to delays in replacement parts and local Dealerships needing equipment and training to effect removal/replacement of faulty High Voltage Battery Junction Box (HVBJB) with a new one. ? My complaint is that Ford's recall notice 22S41 is a software-only attempt to prevent future damage, and does not require removal of the part(s) which are known to fail to be replaced with the re-designed components which are available, and have been used to repair failures under warranty. I have no way of inspecting the original equipment to evaluate current condition; and failure can result in sudden and unexpected loss of power, steering, and braking as well as potentially stranding me in unsafe conditions unable to re-start my vehicle.? ? I would like to see NHTSA strengthen the Ford recall to include both improved software AND removal/replacement of the High Voltage Battery Junction Box (HVBJB) with a new one.

NHTSA ODI 11473469

The HVBJB subassembly in ALL Ford Mach-e vehicles has known defects with 'under-designed' main contactors that are known to fail under normal charging and driving conditions as outlined in current open Ford recall notice for my vehicle 22s41. Unfortunately, the internal damage to contactors is not visible externally, and warning notices on display only after damage has occurred, and can result in sudden loss of propulsion power at highway speed, loss of power steering, and power brakes... and failure of other 12v systems due to failure to charge the 12v battery properly after contactors are damaged. Less catastrophic results can include failure to start; which can 'strand' driver's and passengers in remote areas, bad weather conditions, as well as cause loss of use for weeks due to delays in replacement parts and local Dealerships needing equipment and training to effect removal/replacement of faulty unit with a new HVBJB having re-designed 'beefier' components. My complaint is that Ford's recall notice 22s41 is a software-only attempt to prevent future damage, and does not require removal of the part(s) which are KNOWN TO FAIL to be replaced with the re-designed components which are available, and have been used to repair failures under warranty. I have no way of inspecting the original equipment to evaluate current condition; and failure can result in sudden and unexpected loss of power, steering, and braking as well as potentially 'stranding me' in unsafe conditions unable to re-start my vehicle.? ? I would like to see NHTSA strengthen the Ford recall to include both improved software AND removal/replacement of the HVBJB sub-assembly with the new 'beefier' parts.

NHTSA ODI 11473254

The HVBJB subassembly in ALL Ford Mach-e vehicles has known defects with under-designed main contactors that are known to fail under normal charging and driving conditions as outlined in current open Ford recall notice for my vehicle 22S41. Unfortunately, the internal damage to contactors is not visible externally, and warning notices on display only after damage has occurred, and can result in sudden loss of propulsion power at highway speed, loss of power steering, power brakes, and failure of other 12v systems due to failure to charge the 12v battery properly after contactors are damaged. Less catastrophic results can include failure to start; which can strand driver's and passengers in remote areas, bad weather conditions, as well as cause loss of use for weeks due to delays in replacement parts and local Dealerships needing equipment and training to effect removal/replacement of faulty unit with a new HVBJB having re-designed components capable of meeting safety and normal usage requirements of Mach E owners.? ? My complaint is that Ford's recall notice 22S41 is a software-only attempt to prevent future damage, and does not require removal of the part(s) which are KNOWN TO FAIL to be replaced with the re-designed components which are available, and have been used to repair failures under warranty. I have no way of inspecting the original equipment to evaluate current condition; and failure can result in sudden and unexpected loss of power, steering, and braking as well as potentially stranding me in unsafe conditions unable to re-start my vehicle.? ? I would like to see NHTSA require that the Ford recall include both improved software AND removal/replacement of the HVBJB sub-assembly with the new appropriately specified parts.? Failure examples: https://www.macheforum.com/site/threads/-post-battery-contactor-recall-first-junction-box-failure-.19209/ and https://www.macheforum.com/site/threads/post-recall-software-hvbjb-failure.19396/

NHTSA ODI 11472791